JON KRAMER
Family Therapist and Relationship Coach
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
Monday, October 28, 2019
The 3-Marriage Cycle
Often the starting point for my clinical work with struggling
couples is their desire to remain together.
Other times, it is with couples where one or both of them are not sure
if they want to stay together. Or, the clinical
work begins with couples that have made the decision to move their relationships
toward divorce. In any of these
scenarios, I am interested to assess what marriage cycle the presenting couple is
in. And how their “previous marriages” evolved. Even if they were to each other.
Based on my years of practice, in most long-term relationships
spouses generally marry each other 3 times.
The 1st marriage usually occurs pre-children (“pre-children”). The 2nd one during the years of co-parenting
and work (“children and work”), and their last marriage once their children are
leaving/have left the home and retirement looms (“post-children”). Many of us mark our 1st marriage
with a formal celebration of some kind.
It is the other 2 that quietly occur without any conscious awareness of
any remarriage taking place. It is in
the adjusting to this next marriage that problems sometimes occur. In my post-graduate training I was taught to
identify challenges within “developmental milestones.” This meant pinpointing events that forced
a family to change the way they related to one another. Many of these events are normative, like the
birth of a child, or the adding of another one.
Other times they are unexpected and traumatic like a death or a fire. For couples, I consider the transition from “1
marriage to the next” to be a developmental milestone. A couple has to re-adjust to a changing relationship
between them. It is this unaware experience
that can breed resentments.
The pre-children marriage typically occurs in relative
youth. A couple is more emotionally and
sexually agile because they carry less responsibilities. Even if they don’t realize it there is more
time! There are fewer distractions and they
are able to focus more fully on one other.
In contrast, the children and work marriage is a different and distinct
marriage. A couple must now manage the
multiple stressors of juggling a marital relationship alongside a co-parenting relationship. A couple cannot focus on each other the way
they used to. Men can feel ignored and
women can feel stressed by being everything to everyone. The post-children marriage is in part a
return to the original marriage. A couple must now figure out how to re-focus
on each other without the distractions of their busy family and work lives. They
must now figure out if they still like each other and if they still want to be
together in retirement and for the duration of their lives.
It is not uncommon for me to hear couples discussing anger
and hurt from their current post-children marriage that occurred years ago in their
pre-children marriage. A husband, for
example, realizing that he had been “grieving” a time when he felt noticed by
his spouse. Or that same time when a
wife felt like her husband wanted only her.
Marital transformation regardless of the starting point in my work
occurs when a couple becomes more conscious about their various marital life
cycles. And its impact on who they were,
and who they are, both individually and as a couple.
Thursday, November 29, 2018
Children Will Choose: 2 Ideas As To Why
Children will choose.
Sometimes I sit with couples attempting to strengthen their marriages. Other times I sit with high conflict couples who
are attempting to salvage them. And
still other times I sit with couples who have decided to divorce and are
seeking a path forward for their family, which involves a co-parenting plan. In any of these scenarios, our children are
usually aware on some level that things in their home are not entirely
harmonious. Children crave harmony and safety,
emotional and physical. Somewhere along
an invisible emotional continuum, it happens that a child will make a choice
between aligning himself or herself with one parent or the other.
Cloe Madanes, a pioneering Strategic Family Therapist, has spoken
about human relationships in the context of threes. 2 parents and a child, a couple and an affair,
3 siblings. She encouraged family and
couples therapists to assess the “triads” within a family from a perspective of
who is in and who is out. The in pair
(i.e. a parent and a child) would be described as “in an alliance” and the out
person, the other parent, on the periphery.
It is fairly common for sons to align themselves with their fathers, and
vice versa, or daughters with their mothers.
Gender can be a powerful parent-child magnet. If not careful, struggling partners will
consciously or unconsciously recruit their children to aid and abet in their
fight against each other. Other times
children will consciously or unconsciously choose a side.
Yet, how do children end up choosing? Perhaps an evolutionary instinct to survive
is baked into all of us and as such a child will pick the parent who will best
assure him/her of this. It would be most
interesting to ask a professor of geography like Jared Diamond (Guns, Germs,
and Steel) or else a historian of world history like Yuval Noah Harari (Sapiens:
A Brief History of Humankind) to weigh in on this idea. Intellectuals like Diamond and Harari
describe how humans developed through time and how some lived on and thrived
while others did not. When children are
faced with parents and a home environment that does not feel emotionally safe,
they will perhaps on some primitive level-honed by our species for over 2
million years- choose the parent they think will best “save them.”
Alternatively, we as a society are living in what some have
described as an age of political tribalism.
Regardless of one’s political views, our culture in this regard has pushed
us to choose sides. And to choose from an
“us or them” mentality. In family
systems terms, the president, congress, along with the judiciary, a triad, metaphorically can be seen as our country’s
parental/executive subsystem. They are
often in disagreement over policy and as such set the tone for how they will
interact with each other. Like children
in a family the rest of us look to our government family system to model
appropriate behavior, especially during their moments of conflict. We are living in an age where we are choosing
sides politically while castigating the other, and I wonder if our children are
being socialized to do the same. To
choose a side, a parent, and by association to hold contempt for the other.
I am in the business of assisting couples. Some who are making a go at staying together
and others who are making a go at divorcing while remaining a family. Along this continuum, if couples are not
intentional about how they manage their often-strong negative feelings for the
other, their children will become emotionally frightened and pick a side. They will do this either out of a primitive
instinct or out of what they are learning from our broader culture. Either way, if not careful children will
choose.
Monday, November 5, 2018
Co-Parenting? Maybe
High conflict couples.
Some seek my services attempting to salvage their marriage. Others have decided to divorce and request my
services as a “co-parenting communication expert.” In this latter scenario, I am called upon to
help high conflict couples co-parent their children. Usually these couple’s assumption about
co-parenting is something akin to working together as parents. This is a tall
order if the couple hardly agrees on much, gets into arguments over big and
small issues, and carries too much anger and not enough indifference toward the
other. While co-parenting in principle
is the ideal, sometimes it is beyond a high conflict couple’s reach. In these cases, parallel parenting, while in
my view less preferred, is probably a better, more tenable option.
Co-parenting is a framework that suggests 2 cooperative parents
working together to make decisions on behalf of their children. If the children live in a 2-home
configuration (i.e. part of the week with one parent and the other part of the
week with the other), co-parenting would reflect a similar “culture” in both
homes. This might include similar rules
and expectations related to bedtimes, curfews, screen time limits, and general
behavior. In essence, there would be a
seamless 2-home experience for the children, with 2 parents who have dissolved
their marital relationship yet still value their ability to work together as
parents. These parents would be able to
communicate with each other through direct dialogue, telephone, email or text messaging. They would be able to agree and more
importantly be able to disagree without tensions rising or conflicts between
them intensifying. Within a 2-home co-parenting arrangement, children
generally do well related to depression, anxiety and other psychological
issues.
If there is too much emotional conflict between parents
however, co-parenting is not realistic.
Alternatively, parallel parenting (https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/co-parenting-after-divorce/201309/parallel-parenting-after-divorce)
is probably the better option. Given the similar circumstances of a 2-home
environment, parallel parenting suggests more of an “invisible wall” between
the 2 homes. Each parent sets his or her
own culture, rules and expectations, with limited to no contact between each
other. The children live their lives
with mom on pre-arranged days and holidays and with dad on certain others. The advantage of this arrangement is that
high conflict parents don’t have the opportunity to communicate and thus get
into conflicts with each other. This
inevitably allows both parents to “cool off” and potentially down the road move
toward a co-parenting relationship. The
disadvantage of parallel parenting is that children are often stressed (i.e.
anxious or depressed) as they must accept that their parents carry negative
feelings towards one other and are not able or willing to resolve them.
Commonly, I am asked to assist divorcing couples with
co-parenting needs. The beginning
assumption made by many couples is that they can feud and yet parent together
at the same time. Usually I can help
high conflict couples recognize that this dynamic will not work if they want to
constructively parent together. Some
couples are able to rise above their strong feelings for the other. Others however are too entrenched in thoughts
and feelings and in these cases need to fall back to parallel parenting. My experience is that parallel parenting over
a short period of time does not create deep psychological damage for
children. Over longer periods of time
however, it can. Sounds like an
interesting dissertation project for anyone reading this who might be looking
into a PhD/PsyD topic.
Friday, October 19, 2018
4 Important Aspects Of A Divorce Coach's 1st Session
Sometimes couples come to see me to save their marriage. Other times they come seeking assistance in
navigating the complicated process of divorce.
They have come to this difficult decision, sometimes mutually, sometimes
initiated by one or the other. At this juncture,
I am called upon to act not as the couple’s therapist, but as their “divorce
coach.” When a couple seeking divorce
contacts me, they often want to know what to expect during their first session,
often called an “intake session.”
There are several important topics I cover during this first
session though all are done within the context of assessing the emotional intensity
between the couple. In simple terms this
assessment is done on a scale of low to high emotional intensity. As a divorce coach, assessing the various
“trigger topics” (i.e. where the blame is hiding) and managing the emotional
intensity is my primary job. This ultimately
clears a path for the mediating or collaborative attorneys to move their
clients through their divorce process as expeditiously and as emotionally
pain-free as possible.
Beyond assessing intensity and the associated triggers, an
additional topic of exploration is what we call the couple’s “interests and
concerns.” This is shorthand for what
each client hopes will occur through their divorce process and what each is
worried might happen instead. Common
interests cited by my clients may be, “a divorce that puts the needs of our
children first,” or “a divorce where we can come out and still be on speaking
terms.” Concerns mentioned might be,
“everyone will like my husband better than me and as a result he will get more
of what he wants,” or “since I initiated the divorce my husband will attempt to
punish me financially or with the time share of our children.” Interests and concerns help to highlight
potential triggers and they also begin to provide, particularly the interests,
a road map for how the couple wants to travel their divorce path.
Another important area, borrowed from the Discernment
Counseling work of Dr. William Doherty, is a discussion about the couple’s
“divorce narrative.” Whether the couple
agrees or not on the details, it is vital that each has the opportunity to
describe in their own words how a divorce decision was reached. As a colleague once said to me, we are a
story-making people and without a coherent story, we cannot heal. Beyond the divorce narrative, I also want to
know about any substance abuse, abuse in general, and any trauma
histories. Additionally, I want to know
about the couple’s divorce plan so far.
Have they hired attorneys yet, consulting attorneys, and/or a neutral
accountant? Is either in their own
individual therapies? And if I have an
opportunity at this point I will help couples steer toward non-litigating
professionals. The last part of an
intake session relates to assessing “divorce ambivalence.” To use Dr. Dougherty’s Discernment Counseling
language again, are both partners leaning out, or are either or both still
leaning in? This is an intake assessment
about the couple’s readiness for divorce.
Or either’s desire to return to working on their marriage before taking
additional steps towards divorce.
An intake session for couples seeking marital therapy is
similar and in many ways different to an intake session for couples seeking
divorce. In the latter scenario,
assessing and containing fear and worry about divorce, about how their family
will change, and whether their children will be OK is the first order of
business. Beyond that, several topics including
an assessment of emotional intensity, trigger issues, and others need to be
identified. A structured yet free
flowing first session will help guide the couple, with my assistance, through a
smooth divorce process.
Wednesday, October 10, 2018
4 Important Aspects of A Couples Therapist's 1st Session
I am often asked what to expect by couples coming to see me
for their 1st couples therapy session. There are several areas I set out to cover
during this meeting also referred to as an “intake session.” A productive intake balances a couple’s need
to speak about what brought them in to see me with a structured and emotionally
safe conversation. By the end of this
meeting, a couple should experience some interplay of spontaneity and an organization
of the information discussed.
One important aspect to the intake session is a conversation
about what led the couple to contact me.
How have they reached this particular point where they decided to
address some important, often critical aspects of themselves and their
relationship? From the clinician’s point
of view, how this narrative is
articulated is as important, perhaps even more so, that what is actually
said. For example, is the presenting
problem(s) described in victim-villain terminology? Is there blaming and shaming or instead some
shared understanding of the problem(s)? And,
does each partner conceptualize “how they got here” in a similar, somewhat
different, or entirely different way?
Another part of the intake is the couple’s description of what solution-focused
couples therapists call their “attempted solutions.” This includes any past or present individual
and/or couples therapies. This
information serves to inform the clinician about what has been helpful, to
potentially build upon, as well as what was not, in order to avoid. It also provides a beginning assessment of
the couple’s general attitude toward therapy, each other, and their sense hopefulness
at this point in time.
Another area of the intake conversation is what Dr. William
Doherty, terms “the best of times” assessment.
This question asks each partner to describe a memory of connection or
joy during his or her relationship. Dr.
Doherty uses this assessment tool as part of his “discernment” counseling protocol. I believe this also fits with the couple
therapy intake process. The response to
this question provides 2 things: it can signal a positive feeling in the room
which counter balances the weight of the moment. The couple is offered the opportunity to
“look back” to a nostalgic place and by association perhaps look forward to
possibilities. It also provides a quick
assessment of any ambivalence related to the request for services at this time. If either or both partners are reluctant to
answer or remember “a best of times” then there is usually some ambivalence
towards couple therapy. This might lead
me to pivot towards assessing for discernment counseling instead of couples therapy
as the starting point. Both partners
need to have made a clear decision to pursue their couple’s work in order to
ensure some success in their couple’s therapy.
Other aspects of the intake session include the noting of
any substance abuse, addictions, and/or trauma histories. Additionally, as a trained systemically
oriented couples therapist I inquire about the 5-common stressors that
influence couple satisfaction/dissatisfaction.
Usually the more of these stressors present the greater the emotional turmoil
between the couple. And this starting
point needs to be determined at intake.
The emphasis of an intake session is to get a struggling couple
off to a productive and meaningful therapeutic start. A first couple’s first therapy session is a balance
between allowing a couple to speak freely about what brought them in. And about experiencing a trained therapist who
can make sure there is some semblance of order to a difficult beginning
conversation.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)